Two male rhesus monkeys (H and J; body weight, 9.3–10.6 kg) SAHA HDAC mouse were used. During the experiment, the animal was seated in a primate chair with its head fixed and faced a computer screen. The animal’s eye position was monitored with a video-based eye tracking system with a 225 Hz sampling rate (ET-49, Thomas Recording, Giessen, Germany). Single-unit activity was recorded from the dorsal and ventral striatum using a multielectrode recording system (Thomas Recording) and a multichannel acquisition processor (Plexon Inc., Dallas, TX). All neurons were recorded from the right hemisphere (68 and 90 neurons in the CD and VS, respectively),

except 25 neurons recorded from the caudate nucleus of the left hemisphere in monkey H. All the procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Yale Fulvestrant order University and conformed to the Public Health Services Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The animal performed an intertemporal choice task and a control task in alternating

blocks of 40 trials. During the intertemporal choice task, the animals began each trial by fixating a white square presented at the center of a computer screen. After a 1 s fore-period, two peripheral targets were presented, and the animal was required to shift its gaze toward one of the targets within 1 s, when the central square was extinguished after a 1 s cue period. One of the peripheral targets was green (TS) and delivered a small reward

(0.26 ml of apple juice) when it was chosen, whereas the other target was red (TL) and delivered a large reward (0.4 ml of apple juice). Each target was surrounded by a variable number of yellow dots (n = 0, 2, 4, 6, or 8) that indicated the delay (1 s/dot) before reward delivery after the animal fixated its chosen target. During this reward delay period, the animal was required to fixate the chosen target while the yellow dots disappeared one at a time, but was allowed to refixate the target within 0.3 s without any penalty. The intertrial interval was 2 s after the animal chose TL, but was padded to compensate for the difference in the reward delays for the two targets after the TS was chosen, so that the onset of the next trial was through not influenced by the animal’s choice. The reward delay was 0 or 2 s for TS, and 0, 2, 4, 6, or 8 s for TL. Each of the 10 possible delay combinations for the two targets was presented four times in a given block in a pseudo-random order with the position of the TL counter-balanced. The control task was identical to the intertemporal choice task, except for the following two changes. First, the central fixation target was either green or red, and this indicated the color of the peripheral target the animal was required to choose.