To obtain the 5′

To obtain the 5′ flanking region, the primers AP1/CasR20 and AP2/CasW-E70-R04 were used for

PCR1 and PCR2, respectively. To obtain the 3′ flanking region, the primers AP1/CasF9 and AP2/CasW-E70-F04 were used for PCR1 and PCR2, respectively. PCR reactions were performed in 1× buffer containing 1.5 mM of MgCl2, 200 μM of dNTPs, 200 nM of the #Protein Tyrosine Kinase inhibitor randurls[1|1|,|CHEM1|]# adaptor, 0.2 μM of the Cas-specific primer and 0.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Eurobio, Courtaboeuf, France). All PCRs were conducted under the following conditions: an initial denaturation step (4 min at 95 °C), then 40 cycles (30 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 58 °C, 2 min at 72 °C) and a final extension step (72 °C for 5 min). PCR products migrating as a single unique band after electrophoresis

on an agarose gel were directly sequenced using nested Cas3-specific primers: CasW-E70-R01 for the 5′ flanking region and CasW-E70-F05 for the 3′ flanking region. A new set of primers (CasF20 and CasR28) was designed from both ends of the 5′ and 3′ flanking sequences and used to amplify the complete Cas3 or Cas4 sequence from isolates E70, E78, E79 and E139 using https://www.selleckchem.com/products/nct-501.html the AccuPrime™ Pfx proofreading DNA polymerase (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. All of the primers used in this study are listed in the Electronic Supplementary Material ESM 2. Bioinformatics All nucleotide and amino acid sequence analyses, alignments and annotations were conducted using the Geneious Pro program (Drummond et al. 2011). Homology searches were performed using the Blast program in the NCBI database. A phylogenetic tree of the cassiicolin gene diversity was constructed using MEGA5 software (Tamura et al. 2007) by the Neighbor-Joining method (Saitou and Nei 1987). The analysis involved six nucleotide sequences: JF915169, JF915170, JF915171,

JF915172, GU373809 and EF667973, for isolates E70, E78, E79, E139, CC004 and CCP respectively. The codon positions included in the analysis were 1st+2nd+3rd+Noncoding. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. There was a total of 574 positions in the final dataset. A bootstrap test of 1000 replicates was performed to obtain the percentage in which the associated taxa clustered together (Felsenstein 1985). The evolutionary PD184352 (CI-1040) distances were computed using the p-distance method (Nei and Kumar 2000), and the results were expressed as the number of base differences per site. The synonymous (d S ) and non-synonymous (d N ) substitution rates were calculated by codeml in the PAML package (Goldman and Yang 1994). The prediction of the signal peptide in the protein was performed using SignalP software, version 3.0 (Bendtsen et al. 2004), and the program TMHMM, version 2.0, was used to check for the presence of transmembrane spanning regions in the protein (Krogh et al. 2001). The ProtComp program (version 9.0; http://​www.​softberry.​com) was used to predict the subcellular localization of the protein.

Comments are closed.