This motif, named T-N11-A, with the T and A being part of a short

This motif, named T-N11-A, with the T and A being part of a short inverted repeat, has been proposed and supported by numerous studies as the regulatory binding site sequence to which LysR-type proteins primary bind and recognized as the autoregulatory site (Maddocks & Oyston, 2008). To confirm that YfeR binds to the intergenic region, we performed band shift assays with His-YfeR protein and a 310-bp fragment which includes the yfeH-yfeR promoter region. Slow migrating protein–DNA complexes could be evidenced (Fig. 3b). These complexes were not formed when the T-N11-A binding motif was

deleted (Fig. 3c). The location of yfeH adjacent to yfeR and divergently transcribed makes yfeH a likely candidate to be regulated by YfeR. To confirm this we cloned a yfeH∷lacZ fusion rendering plasmid

pLGYFEHLAC. In addition, the yfeR gene from strain TT1704 was deleted and replaced buy Sotrastaurin by a FRT-flanked Kmr cassette (kam), rendering strain TT1704Y. Plasmid pLGYFEHLAC was then transformed into strains TT1704 and TT1704Y and β-galactosidase activity was evaluated at different osmolarity conditions. The results obtained (Fig. 4) showed that growth at high osmolarity results in yfeH upregulation. In addition, it is also apparent that, independently of the osmolarity of the culture medium, yfeH expression increases when cells enter the stationary Selleck Hydroxychloroquine phase. To further search for additional YfeR-regulated genes we performed a transcriptomic analysis in LB at low osmolarity, which are the conditions rendering higher yfeR expression levels. When compared to the wild-type strain, the yfeR mutant presented several deregulated genes, both up- and downregulated (Table 2). Remarkably, a significant proportion of them belong to functional categories of amino acid transport and metabolism, or cell envelope proteins. The search for new osmoregulated genes in S. Typhimurium led us to identify the yfeR gene. We show here that, as predicted (McClelland et al., 2001) it encodes a new member of the LTTR family, which

includes one of the largest sets of prokaryotic new transcriptional regulators (Henikoff et al., 1988). LTTRs were initially characterized as transcriptional activators of a single divergently transcribed gene. Since then, extensive research has provided evidence that LTTRs also include regulatory proteins that can act either as activators or as repressors of gene expression and that can also be considered as global regulators (Maddocks & Oyston, 2008). A relevant example of this latter class is OxyR, a positive modulator of the expression of genes in response to oxidative stress in E. coli and Salmonella (Christman et al., 1989). Evidence also exists of regulation of genes other than the adjacent one. As an example, NhaR modulates expression of its adjacent gene nhaA in response to Na+ (Rahav-Manor et al., 1992) and, in addition, modulates osmC in response to different environmental inputs (Sturny et al., 2003).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>