This interesting finding led them to the conclusion that while performing CRS + HIPEC, this could be an additional

argument to perform splenectomy. The effects of splenectomy are well known in the trauma population. It is associated with leukocytosis and thrombocytosis in the postoperative period. The click here infection rate with encapsulated bacteria is significantly higher if patients are not vaccinated and can put the patient at risk for overwhelming post-splenectomy sepsis (OPSI) which has a mortality of up to 70% (14). Thrombosis and cardiovascular complications have also been noted in post splenectomy populations (15). In addition, the spleen plays a role in immunity, which is incompletely understood. Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical It can be difficult to determine the cause of the elevated white blood cells in the postoperative period. Is it only the physiologic inflammatory response to splenectomy or a prodrome to an undetected infection? Toutouzas

found that in the trauma population on the fifth operative day, a leukocyte Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical count (WBC) higher than 15 x 10(9)/L, a platelet count divided by the WBC less than 20 and a injury Severerity Score higher than 16 was predictive of sepsis 97% of the time (16). In a prospective study, Weng confirmed these findings (17). In the Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical context of an extensive procedure like CRS + HIPEC, patients are at high risk for infectious complications and higher WBC can be seen. Perioperative vaccination to prevent OPSI is also very important. Becher and al. applied a thorough vaccination protocol and had no OPSI during their follow up period. In the gynecology literature, splenectomy Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical as part of CRS has been investigated. Bidus and al. have shown that post splenectomy patients after CRS had a higher platelet and white blood cell counts than for patients with spleen preservation (18). Leukocytosis alone was not a predictive factor for infection. McCann Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical and al. have described a series of 44 splenectomised patients with CRS for ovarian cancer. They

found that splenectomy was an independent factor for worse overall survival (19). They hypothesized that increased extent of disease affected the spleen and was also associated with a worse outcome. Another possible explanation relates to the immune function of the Sitaxentan spleen. These hypotheses can also be applied to the present article. Magtibay and al. also studied the effects of splenectomy in CRS for ovarian cancer and found no difference in prognosis nor infectious complications (20). He concluded that splenectomy should be part of the cytoreduction when involved by tumor. The hematologic effects of systemic MMC are important. Its dose limiting toxicity is myelosuppression particularly thrombocytopenia and leucopenia which can occur following only one dose (21). When given intra-peritoneal, the systemic effects should be lessened (22). However, myelosuppression still exists with HIPEC (23). Sugarbaker reported 28% grade IV hematologic adverse events with HIPEC, predominantly neutropenia (24).