There were significant differences in CA effect sizes among cropping regions (Fig. 3). According to the overall effect of all practices, CA enhanced crop yield by 6.4% and 5.5% in the Northwest and South, respectively, compared to CT, whereas no significant effects were found in the North and Northeast (P < 0.05). For NT, crop yield was 3.4% higher in the South and 5.4% lower in
the North compared to CT, whereas no significant effects were found in the Northeast or the AC220 in vivo Northwest (P < 0.01). Straw retention showed a positive effect on crop yield in all study regions ( Fig. 3). The effect sizes of CTSR were 6.4% and 4.8% relative to CT in the South and the Northwest, respectively, with no significant positive effects in the Northeast or the North. Crop yield was 11.0% higher under NTSR than under CT in the Northwest, whereas no significant effects were observed in other regions (P < 0.05). Rice is planted in South and North China. However, in the North there were no field experiments with multiple-year experimental duration. For this reason, data for rice fields
were excluded in the comparison of effect sizes among climate patterns. There were significant Lapatinib differences in CA effect sizes on crop yield among annual precipitation levels (P < 0.05, Fig. 4). According to the overall effect of all CA practices, the effect sizes of CA practices decreased with increasing annual precipitation. Significant positive effects occurred in areas with annual precipitation below 600 mm, whereas no marked effects were found when precipitation was above 600 mm. Furthermore, the effect sizes of CA practices increased with aridity index (P < 0.05). When the aridity index is greater than 1.25, the overall CA effects on crop yield in China are most likely positive ( Fig. 4). Meanwhile, the higher the mean annual temperature, the higher were the positive effects on crop yield under CA, although the differences were not significant between the temperature ranges ( Fig. 4). The highest enhancing effects on crop yield occurred when mean annual temperature was higher than 10 °C, whereas the effect was not significant when mean
annual temperature was lower than 5 °C. Large differences in CA effect sizes were found among specific crops (P < 0.05, Fig. 5). According to the overall effect of all DNA Damage inhibitor practices, CA significantly increased rice, wheat and maize yields by 4.1%, 2.9%, and 7.5%, respectively, compared to CT. The highest increase was found for maize. According to the effect of each practice, however, there were no significant effects of NT on the three crop yields. For all three crops in the study, straw retention showed a positive effect on crop yield ( Fig. 5). Rice and maize yields were significantly increased by 5.0% and 8.4% under the CTSR as compared to the CT, respectively, and wheat yield was increased by only 3.0% not a significant effect. NTSR significantly increased wheat and maize yields by 4.9% and 9.