The resulting tree from the MrBayes analysis revealed several sub

The resulting tree from the MrBayes analysis revealed several subgroups among the hydrogenase specific proteases, which correlates with respective hydrogenase group according to Vignais et al [25] (Figure 1); Figure 1 Unrooted phylogenetic tree of hydrogenase selleck chemicals specific proteases. The phylogenetic tree of hydrogenase specific proteases from the MrBayes analysis including the different subgroups they may

be divided into. The proposed subgroups for each protease are marked in the figure; 1 (red), 2 (orange), 3a (blue), 3d (purple), 4 (green) and unknown (black). X: The point in the phylogenetic tree when horizontal gene transfer occurred. Y/Z: Suggested positions of root. B. The phylogenetic tree of hydrogenases adapted from Vignais et al 2004 [25]. Type 2a (HupL) and 3d (HoxH) hydrogenases

which can be found in cyanobacteria are marked in bold. The phylogenetic tree was obtained using MrBayes analyses and the claude credibility GF120918 datasheet values are given beside each branch. For abbreviations see Table 2. 1. Bacterial proteases (cleaves group 1 hydrogenases) 2. Cyanobacterial proteases, HupW type (cleaves group 2 hydrogenases) 3. Bacterial and Archaean proteases a. Archean proteases (cleaves group 3a hydrogenases) d. Bacterial proteases, HoxW type (cleaves group 3d hydrogenases) 4. Bacterial and Archaean proteases, Hyc type (cleaves group 4 hydrogenases) The phylogenetic groups of the hydrogenase specific protease have been named according to the nomenclature used for [NiFe]-hydrogenase. The result from the

PAUP analysis is less resolved but supports the result from MrBayers analysis with some minor differences within group 3d (HoxW in Synechocysis sp. strain PCC 6803 and HoxW in Synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7002 are shown as more closely related). An extended phylogenetic tree was also constructed containing more strains including hydrogenase specific proteases cleaving many type 3b-hydrogenases. This tree was unfortunately less reliable and far from robust with several weak nodes (Additional file 1 and Additional file 2). However the result showed putative group 1 proteases and putative group 3b proteases as less clustered and instead spread around point X (Figure 1 and Additional file 1). Transcriptional studies of hupW in Nostoc punctiforme ATCC 29133 and Nostoc sp strain PCC 7120 Northern hybridisations were performed of hupW in both Nostoc punctiforme and Nostoc PCC 7120 using both N2-fixing and non N2-fixing cultures (Figure 2). The results from Nostoc PCC 7120 revealed two transcripts. The first is shorter (approx. 500 nt) and present under both N2-fixing and non N2-fixing conditions, while the second longer transcript (approx. 1600 nt) is only present under N2-fixing conditions. The size of the longer transcript is comparable with the size of a two-gene operon containing hupW together with the upstream gene alr1422, a gene of unknown function (Figure 3a). RT-PCR confirmed that the two genes are co transcribed (Figure 3a).

Comments are closed.