The diagnostic agreement Alectinib supplier between the examiner and the gold standard was satisfactory for all the diagnostic criteria. The percentage diagnostic agreement exceeded 95%. Clinical examination took place in the classroom with

the child sitting on a stool, under artificial lighting. A mouth mirror, a probe and cotton wads to remove excess plaque were used. All data were collected in a record chart designed for this study in which following the criteria established by EAPD for epidemiological studies[11] every child was coded M (affected by MIH) when at least one permanent first molar presented hypomineralization, whether or not any incisor was also affected. Every Selleckchem BAY 73-4506 surface of the incisors and permanent first molar were examined, and the relevant diagnostic code

(Table 1) was recorded on the odontogram of the chart. Only defects easily distinguishable larger than 2 mm were recorded. The type of treatment required on the basis of the WHO guidelines was also recorded and accordingly, as follows: Checkups: if no treatment was needed or only preventive care to arrest caries and/or seal fissures was required. Non-urgent treatment: when the need was for one or more superficial fillings and treatment for aesthetic reasons. Urgent treatment: when a crown, pulp care and restoration or extraction was needed. To collect information on the medical history of the mother during the pregnancy and childbirth and on the child’s early years, a questionnaire was sent by post and each child handed it in at school, together with the signed informed consent prior to the oral examination. As a part of a larger study, the caries indices for the permanent teeth (DMFT and DMFS) were also measured, using the WHO criteria[24]. To measure the reproducibility of the diagnoses, including those of MIH, 51 examinations were repeated 1 month later. The resulting

weighted Kappa was 0.86, indicating a very high level of agreement. SPSS 18.0® (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Means were compared using Student’s t-test and anova, and the chi-squared test was used for proportion comparison. The significance level Carnitine palmitoyltransferase II was 0.05. The final sample size was 840 children, comprising 51% boys and 49% girls. With a total of 840 children examined and a confidence level of 95% (α = 0.05) for the MIH prevalence found in this reference population of approximately 45,000 people, the level of precision of this study was 0.024. A total of 9668 teeth were examined and 412 teeth could not be examined because of incomplete eruption (1.01% were first permanent molars and 5.6% were incisors). Of the anomalies encountered in dental structures, MIH was the most prevalent, 21.8% (95% CI 19.1–24.