Furthermore, in the SeptiFast (Roche) system, internal transcribe

Furthermore, in the SeptiFast (Roche) system, internal transcribed spacer (ITS) was used as a target region for differentiating species of bacteria and fungi, and not the sequences www.selleckchem.com/products/azd5363.html of 16S rRNA and 18S rRNA as in the nested multiplex qPCR method; consequently, it is not possible to directly compare the parameters of both methods [13]. The examination of blood samples from patients with clinical symptoms of sepsis, with the use of the developed

methodology, gave a percentage of positive results of 69.6% compared to 18.6% obtained with the method of blood culture in the monitored culture system (Table 4). This is a considerable difference, which may raise the suspicion of false positive results, but which seems unlikely, given the use of negative control, that in each case gave a negative result. Specialized, universal media have been used in blood culture for BacT/ALERT® 3D system (bioMérieux) which could prevent the growth of certain microbial species . This could impact on the low percentage of positive results in the blood culture method. A large proportion of positive samples indicates

high sensitivity of the nested-multiplex qPCR method in the diagnostics of microbiological AZD6244 concentration agents that cause sepsis, but it should be remembered that the samples came from patients who experienced clinical signs of sepsis, so there was a high probability of bacteremia or fungemia. Similar Sirolimus research buy results have been shown by Chang et al. in their study using SeptiFast (Roche) test, in which

they demonstrated the presence of bacteria in 75% of blood samples [14]. On the other hand, the use of nested PCR increases the risk of contamination of samples, which may lead to a more frequent appearance of false positive results. Therefore, samples which are positive by nested PCR, but negative by culture may be tested by a third method (e.g. SeptiFast) in order to rule out contamination. The blood culture methods, even in automated systems, do not allow to obtain positive results of the culture in the majority of cases, which does not exclude sepsis in patients [15]. The detection of Fosbretabulin cell line microorganisms in blood by multiplex qPCR and its sensitivity were significantly lower (Tables 3 and 4). Obviously, such results may suggest an occurrence of contamination while drawing the blood sample, when bacteria from the skin get into the sample. These are revealed at the same time as the relevant etiological agent of sepsis using the much more sensitive PCR method. In such a situation, it would be necessary to differentiate the amplification signal strength, to separate signals coming from the contamination.

Comments are closed.