23, n = 44, p = 0.900), but there was a highly significant effect of extended IGIs (χ22 = 11.40, n = 42, p = 0.003). Specifically, self-preening bouts lasted significantly longer in the immediate aftermath of an extended IGI than in the period immediately preceding the conflict (Figure 2). The fact that self-preening was unaffected by short IGIs, and the fact that no diurnal fluctuations in self-preening were evident on days without IGIs (A.N.R., unpublished data), strongly suggests that the increase immediately following

an extended IGI is a direct response to intense conflict. However, this effect was short lived: by the start of the afternoon observation session, long before groups roosted (mean ± SE time from start of observation this website session to roosting = 3.5 ± 0.2 hr, range = 2.2–4.5 hr, n = 16 days), the duration of self-preening bouts had returned to pre-IGI levels (Figure 2). Despite no evidence of prolonged stress, and despite groups always (100% of 134 cases) Selleck Epigenetics Compound Library moving away from the IGI site in the interim, the occurrence and type of IGIs in the morning

(none, short IGI, extended IGI) significantly influenced the likelihood of roosting within a zone of conflict at the end of the day (generalized linear mixed model [GLMM]: χ22 = 23.30, n = 232, p < 0.001). Specifically, zone-of-conflict roosts were more likely to be chosen on evenings when there had been an extended IGI that morning compared to on evenings when there had been a short IGI or no IGI that morning (Figure 3A). Even when controlling for whether a group had roosted in the zone of conflict the night before (by including the location of the previous night’s roost for the subset of observations for which this information was known), the effect of IGI categorization remained highly significant (χ22 = 13.88, n = 153, p = 0.001). Further analysis showed that the effect of IGI categorization was not because groups were more likely to change roost sites on extended IGI days (χ22 = 4.44, n =

153, p = 0.109), but because groups that changed roost were more likely to move to a roost closer to the shared border on nights following an extended IGI than on nights when there Pomalidomide in vitro had been a short IGI or no IGIs that morning (χ22 = 9.52, n = 64, p = 0.009; Figure 3B). When groups roosted within a zone of conflict, their time of arrival at the roost site was significantly affected by IGI categorization (LMM: χ22 = 6.68, n = 70, p = 0.035): they arrived earlier on days when they had experienced an extended IGI than on other occasions (Figure 4A). There was, however, no significant difference in the time they entered the roost for the night depending on IGI categorization (χ22 = 0.13, n = 70, p = 0.938).