, 2013). Removal of spatially structured noise has been greatly improved by an automated “FIX” denoising algorithm (Smith et al.,

2013b). The fMRI data of interest are restricted to gray matter (white matter and nonbrain voxels are largely irrelevant to this analysis). At the 2 mm spatial resolution appropriate for the fMRI data, there are ∼90,000 “grayordinates” (surface vertices for cortex and voxels for subcortical domains). TSA HDAC order Analysis of functional connectivity entails computing the correlation of time series data for 90,000 × 90,000 grayordinates. This amounts to ∼33 GB of data for a “dense connectome” when stored in the recently introduced “CIFTI” grayordinate × grayordinate file format; the data files would be ×6-fold larger if stored learn more in a conventional voxel-based volumetric format (Glasser et al., 2013a). More generally, the CIFTI format provides efficient and flexible way of representing many types of data used by the HCP, including task-fMRI and dMRI results. One widely used way to analyze fcMRI data involves seed-based correlations,

which reveals the spatial pattern associated with any given region of interest (ROI), be it a single seed point or a larger collection of grayordinates or conventional voxels. For example, Figure 5 compares the fcMRI seed-based correlations (column 2) in individual (top row) and a group average (generated from 120 subjects). The selected seed in parietal cortex (black dot, green arrows) reveals a pattern of strong correlations and anticorrelations in several distant regions of frontal, occipital, and temporal cortex (arrows). The high quality of HCP data acquisition and analysis provides notably fine spatial detail for a single grayordinate seed in each individual subject with minimal smoothing of the data.

The group average pattern is similar to the individual but is much blurrier, because the alignment is imperfect but also presumably because there is noise in each of the individual subject maps, as well as biological variation between individuals. One way to examine the specificity is by crossmodal comparisons, using cortical ever myelin maps (column 3) and task fMRI (column 4), that are part of standard HCP data acquisition and processing. The fcMRI patches correspond with patches of heavy cortical myelin (Figure 5C, black dots, arrows). There is also a correlation with the task fMRI results in Figure 5D, which shows the activation pattern from viewing faces in the HCP “Emotion” state. The intersubject registration used in Figure 5 was based only on shape features, using FreeSurfer’s “sulc” maps and registration algorithm (column 1). Alignment can be further improved using a novel multimodal surface matching (MSM) algorithm (Robinson et al., 2013; E.C. Robinson, S. Jbabdi, M.F. Glasser, J. Andersson, G.C. Burgess, M.P. Harms, S.M. Smith, D.C.V.E., and M.