Monoclonal anti-myc antibody was from Cell Signalling Technology. Anti-Flag and anti-β-actin were from Sigma-Aldrich. Recombinant forms of ubiquitin, E1 and E2 (UbcH13/Uev1a) were from Boston Biochem. The His-tagged vector pRSET A was from Invitrogen. LPS was from Alexis Biochemicals. The generation of the construct encoding Pellino3S has been described previously 26. Constructs encoding wild-type IRAK-1, IRAK-1 kinase-dead and TRAF6 were from Tularik (San Francisco, CA, USA). Constructs encoding MyD88, Mal and IKKβ were gifts from Luke O’Neill (Trinity College Dublin). pGL3-Renilla

was a gift from Andrew Bowie learn more (Trinity College Dublin). The drosomycin promoter–reporter construct, the pACH110 vector containing the β-galactosidase gene under the control of the Drosophila actin promoter, and the pAc5.1/V5 Drosophila expression vector were all kind gifts from Jean-Luc Imler (Institut de Biologie Moleculaire et Cellulaire, Strasbourg, France). Two crystal structures of Pellino2, available in the Protein Data Bank (http://www.rcsb.org/pdb), PDB: 3EGA at 1.8 Å and 3EGB

at 3.3 Å 18, were used as templates for comparative modelling. The former codes for residues 15–258 and the later codes click here for 15–276 of the Pellino2 sequence with a number of small gaps where residues could not be refined. Modeller 9v5 21 was used to generate multiple models of viral Pellino modeled as an FHA domain using both Pellino2 templates and manually optimizing the alignment. The C-terminal region of the model was removed from Thr155 of viral Pellino as there was no template structure available for this region. A subsequent Modeller9v5 sequence identity score of 27.6% was achieved and models were shortlisted for subsequent analysis based on the Modeller objective function. The best model was minimised using MOE 2008 (http://www.chemcomp.com) in a 5 Å water sphere using the Amber99 force field. All molecular dynamics simulations were performed with Amber 10.0 35 using a time step of 1 fs and the Amber force field.

Periodic boundary conditions were applied in all three dimensions with the Particle PR-171 ic50 Mesh Ewald (PME) method being used to treat the long-range electrostatic interactions. Non-bonded interactions were calculated for one to four interactions and higher using a cutoff radius of 9 Å. The protein was placed in a TIP3P water box with 12 Å to the box edge. Counter ions (Cl−) were added to ensure a charge neutral cell, by replacing solvent molecules at sites of high electrostatic potential. Each simulation cell, prior to MD, was optimised to remove bad contacts by performing 250 steps of steepest descent followed by 750 steps of conjugate gradient energy minimisation. The simulation cell was heated gradually to 300 K over 10 ps with equilibration performed using backbone restraints for 10 ps at each of 15, 10 and 5 kcal/mol followed by 960 ps without restraints.