Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analyses were completed using SPM8 (Wellcome SCH772984 price Trust Centre for Neuroimaging). Anatomical images were corrected for intensity bias, spatially normalized, and segmented into white matter, gray matter, and cerebrospinal fluid using tissue probability maps (International Consortium for Brain

Mapping). Gray and white matter images were then modulated to reflect the degree of local deformation applied during spatial normalization and smoothed using a 12 mm FWHM Gaussian filter. All images were thresholded at 0.20 probability of tissue classification. This yielded four types of anatomical images for use in subsequent VBM analyses: unmodulated gray, unmodulated white, modulated gray, and modulated white matter images. Umodulated images are thought to reflect the concentration (or “density”) of a tissue class relative to other tissues, while data from modulated images are argued to reflect the amount (or “volume”) of a particular tissue class in a given anatomical area (Ashburner and Friston, 2000). Interpretation of voxel-based morphometry (VBM) results is not always straightforward. Ashburner and Friston (2000) explain that Bleomycin datasheet unmodulated, segmented

images (i.e., images not adjusted to reflect the degree of warping during spatial normalization) reflect the concentration of a tissue type in a given area relative to other tissue types. This is often referred to as tissue “density.” Thus, values along tissue borders are complementary as they are blurred during smoothing, which may partially explain, e.g., corresponding decreases in GM concentration and increases in WM concentration within a single area. Note also that VBM concentrations (unmodulated values) have not been directly linked to cellular make-up or density thus far. VBM values adjusted for the degree Farnesyltransferase of deformation applied during spatial normalization (i.e., modulated values) reflect the total amount of a tissue type in a given region (Ashburner and Friston, 2000). Although these modulated values are often interpreted as a proxy

for “volume,” direct measurements (e.g., of cortical thickness) would be necessary to confirm volumetric differences in a given region. Group analyses using the general linear model (GLM) were executed in single voxels and in regions of interest (ROIs), in order to assess the relationship between fMRI signal and our experimental manipulations (i.e., regressors; Friston et al., 1995) using BrainVoyager. Trials were binned based on their relationship to the tinnitus frequency (TF) into trials in which (1) BPN center frequency (BPNCF) was more than 0.5 octaves below TF, (2) BPNCF was less than or equal to 0.5 octaves below TF, (3) BPNCF matched TF, (4) BPNCF was less than or equal to 0.5 octaves above TF, and (5) BPNCF was more than 0.5 octaves above TF.