Classes begin at these cutting-edge vaccine manufacturing training facilities in February 2011. Another initiative for 2011 is to provide support for the development of adjuvants that are free of intellectual property barriers, available and produced by WHO/HHS grantees

for evaluation with their vaccines. Cooperative agreements with the University of Lausanne in Switzerland and the Infectious Disease Research Institute in Seattle, USA have been initiated to implement this programme (see article by the Vaccine Formulation Laboratory in this issue). Other HHS support to continue building capacity for international influenza vaccine manufacturing in 2011 and beyond is under discussion. Options being considered include more support for LAIV use in developing countries. Other options are feasibility and pilot studies for “modular, multi-product BGB324 nmr vaccine manufacturing facilities” in certain regions to support the production of seasonal vaccines that could be quickly switched to full-scale pandemic influenza vaccine production in a crisis. Such a facility would allow the co-existence of egg- and cell- or recombinant-based technologies, enabling a small, regional facility to follow the evolution of technology and circumvent the old paradigm of a single facility for a single vaccine. It is important, of course,

to assure that appropriate metrics to measure and monitor the success of the various programmes are in place. Clearly, tangible success thus far has been outlined in this issue. However,

check details many intangible, not-so-obvious benefits related to this international support are also important. For example, support for the WHO programme has stimulated further government interest in influenza vaccine development, as witnessed Tryptophan synthase by several high profile commitments of funding in India, Indonesia and Thailand. International diplomacy, virus and sample sharing, and early diagnostic and surveillance benefits are other such benefits. The success of these programmes and lessons learned will help to provide the foundation for the global community to seriously contemplate, and take further steps to develop sustainable influenza vaccine markets where previously there were none. Funding for this study was provided by US Department of Health and Human Services. Both authors are employed by the Department of HHS and have no conflicts of interest. “
“Farmed Atlantic salmon is attacked by several viruses, which represent a continuous threat to the industry. Traditional vaccines based on inactivated virus are available for infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV), salmon pancreas disease virus (SPDV) and infectious salmon anemia virus (ISAV) and a subunit vaccine based on recombinant protein is available for IPNV [1], but these vaccines do not appear to give satisfactory protection in the farming situation.